Governance. Risk. Compliance. Cybersecurity.
MAST Consulting Group - Governance, Risk, Compliance and Cybersecurity Logo
Methodology

Methodology — 360° IT Audit

Our 360° IT Audit methodology is built on five repeatable phases refined across hundreds of engagements in the UAE, KSA, India and Africa. Each phase produces signed-off artefacts that carry forward into the next.

  • ISO/IEC 27001 Certified
  • ISO/IEC 27701 Certified
  • ISO 9001 Certified

Delivered by an ISO/IEC 27001, 27701 & 9001 certified organisation

Guiding principles

  • Risk-led, not checklist-led — every control traces back to a business risk.
  • Evidence-first delivery — every workshop ends with an artefact in your repository.
  • Local context — Arabic, English and Hindi delivery, local regulator relationships.
  • Single source of truth — one risk register, one control set, many audits.
Principles applied to every engagement

Checklist titled "Principles applied to every engagement" with 4 items, every item marked complete: Risk-led, not checklist-led; Evidence-first delivery; Local context; Single source of truth.

  • Risk-led, not checklist-led
  • Evidence-first delivery
  • Local context
  • Single source of truth

Phase 1. Planning

Risk-based scope across all IT domains.

  • Policy and standard drafting against agreed templates
  • Control design workshops with control owners
  • Risk treatment plan signed off by risk committee
  • Tooling and architecture decisions captured in ADRs
360° IT Audit delivery phases

Process flow diagram titled "360° IT Audit delivery phases" with 4 sequential steps: Planning; Execution; Synthesis; Reporting.

  1. Planning
  2. Execution
  3. Synthesis
  4. Reporting

Phase 2. Execution

Domain-by-domain fieldwork and control testing.

  • Defined entry and exit criteria captured in the engagement charter
  • Weekly progress reporting against an agreed traffic-light scorecard
  • Outputs reviewed by a Lead Auditor before sign-off
  • Lessons captured to refine the next Audit & Assurance engagement

Phase 3. Synthesis

Cross-domain risk themes and root-cause analysis.

  • Defined entry and exit criteria captured in the engagement charter
  • Weekly progress reporting against an agreed traffic-light scorecard
  • Outputs reviewed by a Lead Auditor before sign-off
  • Lessons captured to refine the next Audit & Assurance engagement

Phase 4. Reporting

Audit committee report with remediation plan.

  • Defined entry and exit criteria captured in the engagement charter
  • Weekly progress reporting against an agreed traffic-light scorecard
  • Outputs reviewed by a Lead Auditor before sign-off
  • Lessons captured to refine the next Audit & Assurance engagement

Quality gates

Each phase ends with a formal gate review attended by the engagement partner, your sponsor and any second-line stakeholders. No phase closes until the gate criteria are documented and signed off.

  • Gate 1 — scope, RACI and risk appetite formally agreed.
  • Gate 2 — control design reviewed and approved by your security committee.
  • Gate 3 — evidence pack independently sampled before audit submission.
  • Gate 4 — post-audit lessons-learned and continuous improvement plan signed off.
Four quality gates per engagement

Process flow diagram titled "Four quality gates per engagement" with 4 sequential steps: Gate 1; Gate 2; Gate 3; Gate 4.

  1. Gate 1
  2. Gate 2
  3. Gate 3
  4. Gate 4